Available Throughout Florida
Menu
Menu
Available Throughout Florida
Trade secret disputes present a unique combination of legal complexity, emotional intensity, and confidentiality risk that makes them among the most difficult cases in intellectual property law to litigate and some of the most compelling candidates for mediation.
Brian Gilchrist is a certified mediator based in Orlando, Florida, with extensive experience in intellectual property disputes, including trade secret misappropriation cases under both the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act. His practice focuses on helping parties resolve these high-stakes, high-emotion disputes confidentially and efficiently.
The financial stakes of trade secret litigation are significant. The 2017 AIPLA Economic Survey reports that the average cost of a trade secret case ranges from $400,000 to $1,650,000. These figures reflect the genuine complexity of the litigation: trade secret cases routinely involve extensive fact discovery, technical expert testimony, forensic analysis of electronic devices and communications, damages experts, and motion practice that can span years before a case reaches trial.
The discovery process in trade secret litigation is often cloaked in secrecy in a way that is unusual even by IP litigation standards. Protective orders routinely prohibit the parties themselves the clients from reviewing materials produced by the opposing side or even hearing testimony obtained in the case. Attorneys see what their clients cannot.
These restrictions are necessary to protect the very trade secrets at issue, but they come at a significant cost to the parties. Clients involved in trade secret litigation frequently experience a profound sense of frustration and helplessness: they are fighting about information they may never be permitted to see, over a legal process they cannot fully participate in or understand. This dynamic makes trade secret cases unusually difficult to manage and unusually prone to impasse.
The emotional charge in trade secret litigation is unlike most other business disputes. One party has alleged that another has stolen valuable confidential information that is a serious accusation that carries significant personal and professional consequences. This leads to immediate distrust and anger that can define the entire arc of the dispute from the beginning.
In mediation, the alleged victim is asked to negotiate with the accused thief a dynamic that many clients experience as deeply offensive, as though resolution itself requires accepting the wrong done to them. The defendant, meanwhile, is frequently offended by the accusation and may characterize the lawsuit as a fishing expedition designed to uncover the defendant’s own proprietary information under the guise of discovery.
These dynamics make trade secret cases more emotionally difficult to resolve than almost any other type of IP dispute. An experienced mediator who understands this dynamic and who knows how to work with it rather than against it is essential to any meaningful prospect of resolution.
The single most compelling reason to mediate a trade secret dispute rather than litigate it is confidentiality. A court proceeding is a public event. Filings, testimony, and exhibits may become part of the public record. While attorneys and courts do their best to protect trade secrets through protective orders and in camera proceedings, the confidentiality of the underlying information is never fully secure in litigation. Some courts are reluctant to seal proceedings from the public at all and adding real risk that the very secrets at issue will be exposed in the course of trying to protect them.
Mediation is different in kind. Florida’s mediation confidentiality statute provides robust protections: nothing said, disclosed, or produced during mediation is admissible in any subsequent proceeding. The parties can discuss the trade secrets openly in mediation with the mediator, with each other, and in the context of valuing and resolving the dispute without fear that those disclosures will become public record or provide the opposing party ammunition in continued litigation.
For companies whose competitive position depends on keeping their confidential information confidential, the mediation room is simply a safer place than the courtroom to resolve a trade secret dispute.
The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act has a relatively short statute of limitations: three years from the date the misappropriation was discovered or should have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Trade secret theft, by its nature, is often not immediately apparent employees depart, competitors launch products, or markets shift in ways that only later reveal the probable source. By the time misappropriation is discovered, the clock may already be running.
In these circumstances, the need to file suit before any opportunity for settlement discussions is real and common. A complaint may be filed simply to preserve the claim, before either side has had a meaningful opportunity to evaluate the dispute or discuss resolution. In these cases, early mediation before discovery becomes entrenched and positions harden that can save both parties substantial time, money, and disruption.
When a trade secret case has been filed under time pressure, an early mediation session with an experienced mediator can often accomplish more than months of adversarial litigation.
Trade secret disputes can be as technically complex as the most challenging patent cases. When the alleged secrets involve proprietary manufacturing processes, software algorithms, chemical formulations, engineering designs, or other highly specialized subject matter, a mediator without a technical and legal background in IP will struggle to add real value.
An experienced IP mediator can help parties navigate the technical substance of the dispute understanding what the alleged trade secrets actually are, whether they qualify for protection under the applicable legal standard, and how the technical facts bear on the parties’ legal positions without requiring the parties to spend limited session time teaching the basics. This allows the mediation to focus on resolution rather than education.
Trade secret disputes do not always resolve through a simple damages payment. The most durable outcomes often involve a combination of elements tailored to the specific relationship and the nature of the information at issue.
Common components of trade secret mediation settlements include:
An experienced mediator actively works with the parties to identify which combination of these elements produces an outcome both sides can genuinely accept and live with over the long term.
Brian Gilchrist brings this expertise to trade secret mediations in Orlando and throughout Florida. Schedule a consultation to discuss your trade secret matter.
Brian Gilchrist’s trade secret mediation practice is based in Orlando, Florida, and serves parties, IP attorneys, employment counsel, and corporate clients throughout Central Florida and statewide. He regularly works with parties in Tampa, Miami, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Sarasota, Melbourne, Fort Myers, Ocala, and Tallahassee. Dedicated location pages for these markets are coming soon.
Trade secret disputes often involve urgent timelines, multi-state parties, and sensitive information that requires careful handling at every stage. Both in-person and remote mediation formats are available. Brian Gilchrist has the substantive background to handle the full range of trade secret disputes from employee departure cases to competitor misappropriation to licensing and disclosure matters with the expertise and discretion these matters demand.
Protecting confidential information while working toward resolution requires a mediator who understands what’s at stake on both sides of the table. Call us at 407-841-2330 or email us at bgilchrist@allendyer.com to discuss your trade secret matter.
Under both the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, a trade secret is information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by others, and that is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. This can include formulas, patterns, compilations, programs, devices, methods, techniques, or processes. The ‘reasonable efforts’ requirement is critical for companies that do not actively protect their confidential information risk losing trade secret protection entirely.
Yes and it is often most effective at an early stage of litigation, before discovery has become entrenched and the parties have invested heavily in their adversarial positions. Mediation can be used at any point: before extensive discovery, after initial disclosures, or at the summary judgment stage. Given the unusual discovery dynamics in trade secret cases where clients are often excluded from their own case materials early mediation can provide relief that litigation alone cannot.
Florida’s mediation confidentiality statute bars the use of anything disclosed in mediation in any subsequent legal proceeding. This means the parties can discuss the trade secrets openly during mediation and their nature, their value, the circumstances of the alleged misappropriation and without those disclosures becoming part of the public record or providing the opposing side with ammunition in continued litigation. This protection is significantly stronger than the protective orders available in court proceedings.
Yes, and this is one of the areas where an experienced mediator adds the most value in trade secret cases. The accusation of theft creates a charged dynamic that can make rational settlement analysis difficult for both sides. An experienced mediator knows how to separate the emotional charge from the legal and business analysis, help each party move past the personal dimension of the accusation, and focus the conversation on the practical question of how to resolve the dispute in a way that serves both parties’ long-term interests.
The federal Defend Trade Secrets Act provides a three-year statute of limitations, running from the date the misappropriation was discovered or should have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Because trade secret theft is often not discovered immediately, the limitations period can be a significant tactical consideration. Cases are sometimes filed under time pressure before either side has had a real opportunity to discuss settlement. An early mediation in these circumstances can resolve the dispute before the full costs of litigation accumulate.
Brian Gilchrist brings decades of intellectual property litigation experience, including trade secret misappropriation matters under both the DTSA and Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act. He is a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator based in Orlando. His background in technically complex IP disputes means he can engage substantively with the trade secret subject matter, whether it involves proprietary processes, software, formulas, or business information and without requiring parties to educate him on the basics.
Get expert support for intellectual property matters, including protecting innovations and trademarks.